SEO · Architects
SEO for architects: rank on the planning question, not the profession
Homeowners rarely search for an architect. They search for whether they need planning permission to go up into the loft, how much a two-storey extension costs, and what is allowed on a house in a conservation area. The practices that win work organically are the ones that answered those questions properly and were still on the screen when the reader admitted they needed drawings.
In short
SEO for architects in the UK needs a different build from a generic SEO plan, and this is how PipelineOS structures it. Organise by project type rather than by service. RIBA work stages are how a practice thinks and not how a client searches. The first page worth building is Project type pages: the commercial backbone. The most common way this goes wrong: a portfolio of untitled photographs in a grid, carrying no text, no location and no story, which ranks for nothing and explains nothing.
How we build it
Organise by project type rather than by service. RIBA work stages are how a practice thinks and not how a client searches. A rear extension, a loft conversion, a barn conversion, a listed building alteration, a self-build, a garden room, a commercial fit-out and a small housing scheme are eight different buyers with eight different anxieties and eight different budgets. Each deserves a page that states what the practice does at each stage, roughly what the professional fees look like as a percentage or a stage fee, how long planning typically takes in your authorities and what the client has to supply. Vagueness about fees is the single largest conversion leak on architecture websites.
The content engine is planning, and it is genuinely local. Permitted development rights, article 4 directions, conservation area constraints, local plan policies and the temperament of a particular planning authority differ from district to district, and nobody national can write about them convincingly. A practice that publishes a clear guide to getting an extension approved in its own borough, referencing the actual local policy and the actual committee behaviour, will out-rank generic national content for the searches that matter. It is also the content clients screenshot and send to their partner, which is a signal in itself.
The portfolio has to be rebuilt as a set of documents rather than a gallery. One page per project, with a real title, the location at district level, the brief, the constraint that made it difficult, what was approved, the build cost band and the photographs with descriptive filenames and alt text. Most practices publish twenty projects as a scrolling grid of untitled images, which ranks for nothing and answers nothing. A project page for a loft conversion in a conservation area, written properly, is often the highest-converting page on an architecture site, because the reader with the same problem recognises it immediately.
Two supporting layers finish it. First, credentials handled explicitly: whether the practice is ARB registered and RIBA chartered, and what that means for a client, because a significant amount of competing traffic comes from architectural designers and technologists and clients do not reliably know the difference. Second, the local business listing, which matters less for architects than for trades but is not nothing — a correct profile, the right category, and a modest flow of reviews collected at planning approval, which is the moment a client is happiest.
Pages worth building
The pages worth building, in the order we would build them. A small number written properly, not a page per town.
| Page to build | Target searches | Why it earns its place |
|---|---|---|
| Project type pages | loft conversion architect [town], rear extension architect, barn conversion architect [county], listed building architect | The commercial backbone. Each states the stages, the fee basis, the typical programme and what the client provides. Fee transparency is what separates these from a brochure. |
| Local planning guides | planning permission [borough] extension, article 4 [area], conservation area rules [town], permitted development loft | The highest-traffic content on the site and impossible for a national competitor to fake. Date them and revise when local policy changes. |
| Individual project pages | [project type] in [district], contemporary extension [town], approved planning conservation area | One page per project with brief, constraint, outcome and costs. Converts better than any service page because the reader sees their own house. |
| Cost and fee pages | architect fees UK, how much does an architect cost for an extension, planning drawings cost | Enormous search volume and almost universally dodged. Publishing a percentage range and a worked example wins the enquiry from the practice that says get in touch for a quote. |
| Credentials and process | what does an architect do, ARB registered architect [town], architect vs architectural designer | Clarifies the difference between an architect and a designer, which a large share of your prospective clients genuinely do not know. Useful internal linking hub. |
Running SEO for a architect business already?Send us view access or a screenshot and we will tell you what we would change first, at no charge.
Call 07443 392243WhatsAppTimeline and effort
The programme runs long because the content is heavy. The first two months are technical work, the project pages for the eight or ten schemes worth showing, and the first two project type pages. Months three to six add the local planning guides, which need somebody in the practice to actually describe how a particular authority behaves. Months six to twelve add the remaining project types, the fee content and the slow authority work — local press, community group talks, RIBA and ARB directory presence, planning consultants who refer. First meaningful enquiries usually land around month four to six, and the compounding shows in year two.
The arithmetic is more forgiving than in most sectors because the fee scales with the project. Residential professional fees commonly run 6–12% of build cost depending on the stages appointed, so a £120,000 extension carries roughly £8,000–£14,000 of fee, and a full-service appointment on a £400,000 self-build considerably more. A small practice converts perhaps one in four or five genuine enquiries into an appointment, because clients meet two or three practices and some projects simply die at cost stage.
Put those together. At a £9,000 average fee, a contribution of roughly 55% after director time, and a one in four conversion, an enquiry is worth around £1,200 — which is a break-even cost per lead that no amount of organic investment is going to approach. The constraint on architectural SEO is therefore never whether it pays; it is whether the practice will supply the local planning knowledge and the project detail that make the pages worth ranking. Practices that hand over a logo and expect content to appear get pages that read like every other practice.
Four ways this goes wrong
- A portfolio of untitled photographs in a grid, carrying no text, no location and no story, which ranks for nothing and explains nothing.
- Refusing to publish any fee guidance at all, so every enquiry begins with the question you were avoiding and a third of readers leave to find a practice that answered it.
- Writing generic national planning content that competes with the Planning Portal, instead of the borough-specific guidance only you can write.
- Structuring the site around RIBA work stages, which no homeowner searches for and few understand before their second meeting.
- Leaving the ARB and RIBA position ambiguous while competing against architectural designers, when clarity there is a genuine competitive advantage.
The two pages behind this one
This page is the intersection. For the wider picture:
Questions
Do architects need local SEO or national SEO?
Mostly local, but the definition of local is wider than for a trade. Residential clients will appoint a practice up to an hour away for the right fit, and specialist work such as listed buildings, passivhaus or barn conversions attracts enquiries from across the country. Build the planning content for your own authorities and the specialism pages without geographic limits.
Is publishing fees really a good idea?
It is one of the highest-return changes an architecture site can make. Clients search cost constantly and almost every practice avoids the subject, so the one that gives a percentage range, a stage breakdown and a worked example wins the enquiry before a competitor has replied to an email. It also filters out projects whose budget was never going to support a professional appointment.
How important is the project photography?
Very, but not on its own. Professional photographs raise conversion sharply once a visitor is on a project page. They do nothing to get them there, because an image without surrounding text carries almost no ranking signal. The combination that works is good photography inside a written project page describing the brief, the constraint and the outcome.
How long does architecture SEO take to produce enquiries?
Four to six months for the first genuine ones and about a year before it feels like a channel rather than an occasional surprise. The local planning content moves fastest because competition for it is weak. Project type pages take longer, since larger practices and national lead-generation sites are already ranking and have to be displaced rather than out-published.
Related
Talk to a human
SEO for your architect business
Tell us the area you cover and your average job value. We will say what is realistic before you spend anything.